← Articles

Digital work hygiene3 min read·6. May 2026

Hybrid leadership in 2026: why the conversation about private interruptions matters too

JR

Jesper Riedel
Driving force · hybridledelse.dk

We recently gave a talk on hybrid leadership in 2026 to a group of experienced IT leaders. It turned into one of those conversations you keep turning over on the way home, because it went straight to one of the biggest gaps in leading at a distance today: the lack of real digital working habits, and of each person’s responsibility for their own digital wellbeing.

Why HR can’t guarantee your digital wellbeing

We talk a lot about the cultural side of hybrid work, but we often forget who actually owns the digital environment we work in. Traditionally, topics like digital wellbeing and behaviour have sat with HR. But in a working life shaped by hybrid leadership and leading at a distance, HR faces a real barrier: they rarely control the technical settings, or have the understanding to judge what should be adjusted. They can write policies about “focus time”, but they can’t “code” the systems to support it in practice.

The IT department, on the other hand, controls the settings, but its focus is often fixed on operations and security, not on how technology affects our mental bandwidth. Perhaps we need a “digital anthropologist” in IT. Someone who can design “defaults” that actively shield us from work-related noise, and who understands both the people and the machines.

The elephant on the desk: private self-interruptions

But technology can’t do it alone. During our talk the other day, one participant spotted an important gap in our slides: we’re happy to talk about meeting overload and Slack notifications, but we avoid the difficult conversation about our private lives.

The phone lighting up on the table. The Instagram app you open on autopilot. The message from the family in the middle of deep focus time.

These “self-interruptions” are a massive threat to our wellbeing, but they can’t be solved with rigid rules or IT bans. We can’t (and shouldn’t) dictate employees’ private lives, but we do need to talk about what they mean for people’s ability to perform and for their mental energy. It’s one of the central elements of our TechLifeBalance concept, but more on that another time.

From control to self-awareness

When you lead at a distance, trust is the foundation. So the answer to private interruptions isn’t control, but dialogue and self-reflection. In our experience, employees either find a way around the rules, or find greener pastures.

As leaders, it’s our job to create a space where we can talk openly about:

  • Impact: How does it affect your wellbeing when you switch context between work and private life 50 times a day?
  • Self-awareness: What patterns do you see in your own self-interruptions?
  • Needs: When does it matter to be reachable for family and friends, and when does it just add unnecessary stress?

The leader’s new role: facilitator of the difficult conversation

Good hybrid leadership in 2026 is also about daring to put into words what goes on outside the company’s systems. And to be honest, it’s often about us as leaders too. We have to help each other understand ourselves better, so we can take charge of our own digital attention.

The solution is a combination: an IT department that builds the technical safeguards, and a leader who dares to have the conversation about human habits.

Is your organisation ready to talk about what actually interrupts us?

JR

Written by
Jesper Riedel

Specialist in hybrid leadership, collaboration design and digital work hygiene. More than 20 years in international tech organisations.

Book a conversation →