Two colleagues in conversation behind frosted glass

Guide · The basics

What is hybrid leadership?
The complete guide

Most teams now move between the office and working from home. Hybrid leadership is the discipline of making the office and the screen work at once, so collaboration holds up no matter who’s physically present. The hard part is stopping the people on screen from becoming a B team while the people in the room set the agenda.

◷ About 10 min read

◍ Updated July 2026

⌘ By Jesper Riedel

The definition

Hybrid leadership, defined

Hybrid leadership is about creating cohesion in teams that work across locations. It’s the craft of keeping collaboration strong, wellbeing high and results steady, whether people sit next to each other or work from separate places.

The word covers more than working-from-home days. Hybrid work varies along two axes: place (the office or at a distance) and time (synchronous, where we work at the same time, or asynchronous, where we pick the work up at different points in the day). A leader who only deals with place misses half the job: designing when the team needs to be together in real time, when quiet focus and asynchronous work get more done, and how the team agrees on the way it works together.

Hybrid leadership isn’t just ‘ordinary leadership plus Microsoft Teams’. It takes deliberate attention to what’s different at a distance, because the basic mechanisms of leadership no longer happen by themselves: reading the room, catching signals, building relationships in passing. In a hybrid setup, everything informal has to be designed on purpose. At the same time, hybrid leadership isn’t a whole new philosophy of leadership either. We usually put it like this: strong hybrid leadership is good modern leadership, plus an understanding of what’s different at a distance, and a willingness to build the things that make up for it.

The terms

Hybrid leadership, leading at a distance, or virtual leadership?

The three terms get used interchangeably, but they describe three different leadership situations.

01

Leading at a distance

Leading people you don’t share a workplace with, either full time or on some days of the week. The focus is on agreements, follow-up and communication rhythms across distance.

02

Virtual leadership

Leading a team where everyone works away from the office and meets online. Everyone takes part on the same terms. That makes the situation more symmetrical, but the relationships still have to be tended deliberately.

03

Hybrid leadership

Leading a team that moves between the office and working at a distance. It’s often the hardest of the three, because the leader has to make both spaces work at the same time, without the people on screen being forgotten.

The difficulty is that the situation is lopsided: some people are together in the room, others are on a screen. Human beings come with a built-in proximity bias: we instinctively see, remember and favour the people who are physically close to us. Much of good hybrid leadership comes down to countering that bias. Microsoft’s Work Trend Index (2022) put numbers on it: 43% of people working at a distance don’t feel included in meetings, while only 27% of companies have agreed ground rules for hybrid meetings. If your challenge is specifically about leading people who work away from the office, read our page on leading at a distance.

The challenges

Why hybrid leadership is hard in practice

The same six frictions come up in almost every organisation we work with.

01

Proximity bias

The people sitting closest to the leader get seen the most, and often get the interesting work. The people at a distance get the minutes. Without a deliberate counterweight, being seen in the office starts to shape careers.

02

Meeting overload

When work turned flexible, the meeting became the default answer to everything. The result is calendars with no focus time, and people working in the evening to finish what the day should have held.

03

Culture & belonging

The informal side of work doesn’t build itself across screens: the chat by the coffee machine, the quick question. Belonging slips away quietly, until the resignation lands.

04

Onboarding new people

New colleagues risk being “forgotten” in a hybrid week where everyone assumes somebody else has them covered. The first few months decide whether they ever become part of the culture.

05

Digital working habits

Notifications, channels and the expectation of always being “on” wear down wellbeing. Without shared agreements about availability, flexibility turns into a working day with no edges.

06

Unclear ways of working

When nobody has agreed when and why you come into the office, people commute in for a day of video calls, and rightly ask what they came in for, and whether the day was worth the commute.

The model

The 5 pillars: a practical model for hybrid leadership

Five disciplines that together cover what hybrid leadership asks of you. It’s built on a Danish method we call De 5 R’er, after five Danish words: Retning, Relationer, Rammer, Rytmer and Robusthed. In English: Direction, Relationships, Ways of working, Rhythms and Resilience. The model is the backbone of our talks and our leadership programmes.

01

Direction

A hybrid team can’t be run on attendance. It has to be run by purpose and goals. Everyone needs to know what matters most right now, without having to be in the room to pick it up.

02

Relationships

Trust and good working relationships no longer grow on their own. They have to be planned: regular one-to-ones, making real use of the days you’re together, and deliberately including the people who aren’t in the room.

03

Ways of working

Clear, shared agreements about where and when the work happens, which channels are used for what, and what’s expected of a meeting. Unwritten expectations are the most common source of hybrid friction.

04

Rhythms

A predictable meeting rhythm and protected focus time. A good hybrid week has fewer, better meetings and steady rhythms, so nobody has to guess when things happen.

05

Resilience

The ability to cope with pressure and change: a team that still works well together when storms, world events or a reorganisation get in the way. Resilience is built before the crisis, not during it.

Read the whole model, with the symptoms and the practical steps for each pillar: The 5 pillars of hybrid leadership. Want to work with the 5 pillars in practice? We present the model in the talk Hybrid Leadership 2.0 and work with it in depth in our leadership programme.

Getting started

How to strengthen your hybrid leadership in four steps

You don’t need a big transformation to get going. Start here.

01

Map what’s actually happening

How does the working week really run? Ask your people, and look at the data: how many meetings, how much focus time, who’s in the office and when. Decisions about hybrid work made without data turn into a contest of opinions.

02

Make clear agreements

Write your agreements down together with the team: when do we meet, which channels do we use for what, how do we follow up. A one-page team agreement beats ten policies in a shared drive.

03

Train the leaders

Hybrid leadership is a set of skills, not a set of opinions. And skills can be learned. Invest in training the leadership team, so everyone leads by the same principles instead of each by their own gut feeling.

04

Follow up on what you agreed, not on who’s at their desk

Measure results and agreements rather than attendance. And review your agreements every six months: hybrid work is a learning process, not a decision you make once.

Next step

Want help putting hybrid leadership into practice?

Tell us briefly where you stand, and we’ll get back to you on whether a talk, a workshop or a programme would make the biggest difference for you.

↻

Reply within 1–2 working days

Frequently asked questions about hybrid leadership
What is hybrid leadership?

Hybrid leadership means leading teams whose members move between working at the office and working at a distance. It’s about giving direction, building relationships and getting results, in the office and online at the same time, so collaboration works no matter where each person sits.

What’s the difference between hybrid leadership and leading at a distance?

Leading at a distance means leading people who work away from the office. Hybrid leadership is broader: it means leading a set-up where the team moves between office and home, and where the leader has to handle the office and the screen at once and make sure nobody working from home gets overlooked.

What skills does hybrid leadership take?

The most important ones are setting clear direction and clear agreements, building relationships and trust at a distance, designing good meeting rhythms with protected focus time, following up on agreements rather than attendance, and countering proximity bias, so being seen in the office doesn’t quietly start to shape careers.

How many office days is the right number?

That’s the wrong question to start with. Start with the purpose: what’s the office for in your organisation? Collaboration, creativity, a sense of belonging? The number of days follows from the answer, and it varies from team to team. Fixed days without a purpose just give you a commute to a video call.

What are the 5 pillars of hybrid leadership?

The 5 pillars of hybrid leadership is a practical model built on a Danish method called De 5 R’er. The five pillars are Direction (running the team by purpose rather than attendance), Relationships (planned rather than left to chance), Ways of working (clear and shared), Rhythms (predictable meetings and protected focus time) and Resilience (collaboration that holds up under pressure and change).